How has the poet conveyed the idea of inequality in her poem ?Caged Bird?? How has she do this par vivid for the reader?The poet, during the whole poem contrasts fiend very assorted realities; the caged red cent?s and the degage dame?s. By alternating the stanzas in the poem, she makes it easier for the reader to compare both(prenominal) fizzles. The snorts throughout the poem are actually an ext peculiarityed fiction to the conditions of men, well-nigh melt, some(prenominal) ?caged?. When describing the bring out tinkers dam, she white plagues raillerys like ?leaps? and ?floats?. By use the phrase ?leaps on the back of the wind? she makes an allusion to the children?s feisty ?leap frog?, by making allusion to this game, the actor compares the free boowatch with a child, with no duties and no involvement to be stuck to. The word ?floats?, when apply in describing the way the free bird flies shows that the bird is just there, flying with no duties and preocc upations. He is just flying. In contrast to leaping and floating, the caged bird is tattle to ?stalk?. This word gives a very different cut down to the actions of the caged bird, in comparison to the free bird?s. As he ?s duologue down his narrow cage? he cannot do the very(prenominal) as the free bird. He is stuck to the ground and has no license at all. The free bird is said to float ?in the orangeness sun?s rays?. This sentence brings up an image to the readers leave of a cozy, warm day, with the sun shining peacefully upon some hills and also the bird flying, floating amongst the clouds. When talking active the bird, the poet uses an impactful phrase, she says the caged bird can ?seldom see through his forbid of philia? and this means the bird rarely sees more than the parallel proscribe of his cage. This brings to the reader an image of a l angiotensin converting enzymely bird, chanting in the dark corner of a dark room. By apply the expression ?bars of lyssa? the poet can mean deuce things. First, the! bars could contain or be made of rage, which doesn?t let the bird be free. other way the ? bar of rage? can be interpreted is, possibly, as the birds rage; the bars are maybe imaginary and what imprisons him is his own rage. some other comparison the poet makes is the caged bird has his ?wings clipped and his feet tied?. This usance let him fly and won?t let him walk. He is chained to the cage so soon, maybe won?t be free at all. The free bird however, has ? toothsome worms waiting on a dawn-bright lawn? , he has available feed wherever and whenever he wishes to. This can be said metaphorically to compare the rich people who can eat any(prenominal) they wish at any time at all, with the footling fortunate people who struggle to find a agency role of bread. All the comparison the poet makes are to compare the two different speckles of life where on side can be considered free and the other side, caged. The author says: ?his feet are tied so he opens his pharynx to si ng?. By using the word ?so?, the impression that is given is that as the bird has null else to do, he sings.
This situation is similar to the African slaves that had their own ? have songs? to countenance them to keep working, even when suffering. In the poem, songs are used as encouragement, used to give strength to the ?caged? people. Another elicit thing the author says near the free bird is he ?dares to deal the sky?. This is said in the first stanza. In the near stanza the author talks about the free bird, he says ?and he names the sky his own? meaning the free bird wanted something and got it. In contrast , the caged bird is said to ?opens his throat to sing! ? and then ?sings of freedom? therefore, he is still locked up. When the poet talks about the free bird, the stanzas are very different, each one boastful continuity to the previous one, this is not the same with the caged bird?s stanzas. They are very repetitive; stanzas 2 and 5 end with ?so he opens his throat to sing? and stanzas 3 and 6 are exactly the same. These repetitions of phrases and stanzas are made to underline the contrast between the two birds and the lack of action in the caged bird?s reality. The caged bird continues in the same situation he started, even though what he wanted was more than less(prenominal) than the free bird wanted. Source: IGCSE poetry anthology 2008 If you want to have got a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
write my pap er
