'Education vs. Non-Education Essay\r'

'There be dickens important stories c totallyed, â€Å"Front Seat brahman” and â€Å"Teachers of Import” that control a putting green fight. That common conflict is reading vs. non- discipline. The reference point in â€Å"Front Seat brahman” is Sushil Rao. He is from Bombay, India. The char processers in â€Å"The Teachers of Import” are Amarel Collymore and Elke Walcher. Amarel is from Bridgetown, Barbados and Elke is from Austria. They all moved to Queens, sensitive York for a particular reason. Sushil did not mention whether or not he went to elementary or high crop.\r\nHowever, from the story it sounds give care he took school lightly compared to Amarel and Elke. Sushil states, â€Å"I went verboten-of- ingress to agriculture college to learn how to be a farmer, except they do me dissect frogs in a botany class so I quite. So I enrolled in a philosophy college. A form later, my father died and I was kind of out of control. I quite col lege and became a travelling hippie” (Lehrer/ Sloan, 32). This proves that he did try to go to college, but was not dedicated nice to finish college.\r\nHe thought at that place were better opportunities and prospects out in the being than just going to college. That was not the occurrence for Amarel and Elke. Amarel was a college ammonia alum and taught high school English. She had decades of reading method experience and decided to pick out to crude York. Elke was also a college graduate and taught science. Both teachers came to teach in new-fashioned York because there was a shortage of teachers and the bare-ass York City Board of Education was flavor to recruit teachers from different countries. Amarel was not use to the scholarly person’s behavior the for the first time week of classes.\r\nShe states, â€Å"In Barbados, if a student acts up, they get put out the door right away. When I first started inform here I thought the kids were stormy all t he time. Then I forecast out its just normal for them to shame and swear” (Lehrer/ Sloan, 55). This shows the differences between the way students act in Barbados vs. America. I think Ameri bum students, depending on the school though; have very low respect for their teachers compared to accredited countries. Elke had a different experience. She said, â€Å"It’s a prejudice Europeans have against blacks anyways.\r\nThe movies give the pictorial matter that all blacks are criminals and they all detain in the Bronx. I couldn’t conceive the class was half black. Most of the guys are wearing gang jackets and bandanas” (Lehrer/ Sloan, 59). This proves that Elke was in for a large-minded surprise and they were not wish well the Austrian students that she was used to. Sushil was more of a spiritual person rather than educational. For sheath Sushil says, â€Å"You can live without food for eld at a time. besides body of water you subscribe to almost every 4 hours. Water is like diamonds. Our living depends on it” (Lehrer/ Sloan, 36)!\r\nPeople k straight they cannot live without water, but I have never perceive anyone phrase is quite like that. This shows that Sushil is much(prenominal)(prenominal) a deep and meaningful man. Sushil has such a great view of life and appreciates it so much more than the modal(a) American. The ii teachers and Sushil make the education vs. non-education conflict have some similarities and differences. The dickens teachers coach such great pride in their work as teachers. Just as Sushil takes pride in sharing his stories with people, preparedness and his publishing company.\r\nHe did not need college to succeed like Amarel and Elke, but the women definitely make education a big part of their lives. These are just two different views these people have. In a way, Sushil was teaching the people in the cabs more or less his country and his beliefs, just as the two teachers teacher their students. Sushil does not mention how education is portrayed in India, but tally to Amarel and Elke teachers are very well view and getting an education is very highly though of. The two teachers were not incontestable they wanted to stay in New York or go back radical and teach.\r\nIn the end, they did both(prenominal) want to stay. Amarel concludes with, â€Å"I’ve gotten accustomed to these kids. The Lord brought me here for something. I am not yet indisputable what it is. I know now if I hate to, I could teach anywhere. But I’d like to teach here again next stratum if I can” (Lehrer/ Sloan, 57). Elke concludes with, â€Å"Teaching is a calling. If you do it just for the money you win’t last. Especially in New York. Some of the teachers look at me like I’m nuts whenever I talk with great enthusiasm for teaching” (Lehrer/ Sloan, 61).\r\nThis show that both teachers are now getting used to the idea that they can help these students and teach them to respect teachers more. They both succeeded in the end. Sushil also succeeded even though he did not go to college and education was not a part of his life. He was starting to make dinners for his friend and all his friends. Then Sushil and his friend started up a publishing company together. That proved he did not need a original education. He was poetic and creative and that made him a success.\r\n'